Himanshu Chopra v. Airbnb, Inc., et al.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HIMANSHU CHOPRA, Case No. 25-cv-04416-JST 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. COMPEL ARBITRATION; GRANTING MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE 10 AIRBNB, INC., et al., SERVICE; DENYING MOTION FOR DISCOVERY; AND STAYING ACTION Defendants. 11 Re: ECF Nos. 38, 49, 58 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Airbnb’s motion to compel arbitration, Plaintiff Himanshu 14 Chopra’s ex parte motion for alternative service on Defendant Kim Bryan, and Chopra’s ex parte 15 motion to compel limited disclosures against Airbnb. ECF Nos. 38, 49,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.