Legal Opinion
Kammerer v. University of Kansas, The
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 17, 2024No. 2:24-cv-02182Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS KARL KAMMERER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-CV-2182-JAR-BGS THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS, BRIAN ANDERSON, and SUSAN SCHOLZ, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Karl Kammerer filed this action against three Defendants: the University of Kansas, Brian Anderson, and Susan Scholz. He brings claims under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) against Anderson and Scholz, and a claim under the Rehabilitation Act against the University. Defendants moved to dismiss all claims under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and the Court granted the motion…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- James R. Ahrenholz, Plaintiff-Appellee/respondent v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Defendant-Appellant/petitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Joey L. Mitchell v. Glenn ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.