Legal Opinion

McElhaney v. Harper-Hutzel Hospital

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 2006No. Docket 254376PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Saad, EJ.

i

In this medical malpractice action, the dispositive question is whether, under MCL 600.2169, an obstetrician/gynecologist may testify about the standard of care applicable to a nurse midwife. Flaintiff claims that, during his mother’s labor, the negligent actions of defendant’s nurse midwife caused him mental retardation and other impairments. We hold that the trial court correctly granted summary disposition to defendant because plaintiff failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact regarding the standard of care applicable to a nurse midwife.

Defendant contends that,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Craig v. Oakwood HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cadle Co. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Cox v. Eric J. Hartman, M.D., & Blue Water Obstetrics & Gynecology Prof'l Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. King v. ReedMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Bates v. GilbertMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Attorney General v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API