Legal Opinion

Celerity, Inc. v. Ultra Clean Holding, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 28, 2007No. C 05-4374 MMCJLPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LARSON, Chief United States Magistrate Judge.

Introduction

Subject matter jurisdiction is conferred on this Court under the national patent laws. 28 U.S.C. § 1331 & 1338(a). All discovery was referred by the district court (Hon. Maxine M. Chesney) as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Civil Local Rule 72. The parties filed letter briefs regarding two discovery disputes and the Court heard oral argument. Robert Camors, THELEN REID BROWN RAYS-MAN & STEINER, appeared for Celerity. Lisa Kobialka, PERKINS COIE, appeared for Ultra Clean Technology and Ultra Clean Holdings (“UCT”). The matter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Echostar Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Collaboration Properties, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  3. Genentech, Inc. v. Insmed IncorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
  4. Sharper Image Corp. v. Honeywell International Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  5. Michlin v. Canon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lifenet, Inc. v. Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API