Legal Opinion
Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. International Terminal Operating Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 16, 1985No. 80 Civ. 4349 (CLB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRIEANT, District Judge.
The Plaintiff, Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. (“MORMAC”), filed a claim in indemnity against defendant, International Terminal Operating Company, Inc. (“I.T.O.”). MORMAC, an ocean carrier, seeks to recover for amounts it paid to cargo claimants as reimbursement for the loss or non-delivery of various goods at the 23rd Street Terminal in Brooklyn, New York. By consent, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and after representing to this Court that the ease involved a factual dispute only, the parties tried the case before Hon. Joel J. Tyler, United States…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moore McCormack Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner v. International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Orient Atlantic Parco, Inc. v. Maersk LinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Hekmat v. U.S. Transportation Security AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Brocsonic Co., Ltd. v. M/V" MATHILDE MAERSK"District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Hup Aik Huat Trading Pte Ltd. v. 900 Bags of Malabar Garbled End of Front Matter Black Pepper in Ocean Shipping Containers Nos. TRIU3419945, MSCU2624506, & TPHU6233345District Court, D. Maryland · 2000