Legal Opinion

Chase v. New York Central Rail Road

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1857PublishedCited by 21 opinions

MOTION for a new trial, on exceptions taken at the circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Mullett, J.

Although the attorneys for the respective parties call themselves attorneys for the appellant and attorneys for the respondent, this is not an appeal. There is nothing in the papers showing that there was any judgment or order to appeal, from, or any appeal pretended to be made. It is simply a motion for a new trial, on exceptions taken at the circuit. The judge who tried the cause, it is true, made an- order that the defendants have time to make a case, or a bill of exceptions, and that the same be heard, in the first instance, at the general term; but the papers…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kansas Pacific Railway v. MihlmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Drake v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. Folsom v. Apple River Log-Driving Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Adams v. Hastings & Dakota RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API