Legal Opinion

State v. Uelentrup

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 1995No. 65623PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, Judge.

Defendant, John Uelentrup, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of two counts of sodomy and two counts of sexual abuse. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of twelve years for each count of sodomy. De fendant was also sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of three years for each count of sexual abuse to be served consecutively to the sentences imposed on the sodomy convictions. We affirm.

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdicts, the evidence established…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. State v. HowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. State v. NauckeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State v. BowlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jamison v. State, Department of Social Services, Division of Family ServicesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. State v. WallaceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State ex rel. George v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Guese v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API