Legal Opinion

Willar v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 28, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The petitioners allege in substance that the Commonwealth, through the department of public works, took their land for a public highway; that they made with the department an agreement for settlement whereby the Commonwealth was to pay them $27,780 in full for their damages; that the account has been certified by the comptroller (G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 29, § 18); but that the Governor and Council have taken no action thereon, and the money has not been paid. As we construe the petition, breach of the contract of settlement is the gist of the petitioners’ case.

The principal contentions of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Daly v. Mayor of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Boston & Albany Railroad v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Godfrey Coal Co. v. GrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. City of Lowell v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Attorney General v. Trustees of Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Antoun v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. George A. Fuller Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API