Hash v. State

Ruffin, Judge.

A jury found Robert Hash guilty of theft by receiving. In his sole enumeration of error, Hash argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. For reasons which follow, we affirm.

“‘On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, and [Hash] no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence; moreover, an appellate court does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility but only determines whether the evidence is sufficient under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781,…