Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Linden Capital Partners III LP

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided June 28, 2022No. 2:20-cv-03719Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION ) C/A No.: 2:20-cv-3719-RMG ) Patrick K. Donnelly, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER AND OPINION v. ) ) Linden Capital Partners III, L.P., ) Linden Capital Partners IV, L.P., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) The matter before the Court is Plaintiff, Patrick K. Donnelly’s motion to strike the expert opinion and report of Defendants’ expert Anthony Ecock pursuant to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. (Dkt. No. 84). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part, denied in part.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. Cooper v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. Marx & Co. v. Diners' Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API