Legal Opinion

Barnes & Tucker Co. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1979No. Appeal, No. 1964 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Prank Sewalish (claimant) was employed as a wireman for Barnes and Tucker Company (employer). Claimant’s job involved lifting 200-pound sections of wire. On June 11, 1974, while engaged in this strenuous work, claimant experienced severe chest pains. He was taken to a hospital where his condition was misdiagnosed as “bursitis” and he was cleared to return to work. Claimant continued to experience milder chest pains until July 27, 1974, when the pain became so severe he was again forced to stop working. He was again taken to the hospital where his chest pains were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bernard S. Pincus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Creighan v. Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Plasteel Products Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. G.M. & W. Coal Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meadow Lakes Apartments v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Duquesne Light Co. v. BattistiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. L.E. Smith Glass Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API