Legal Opinion

Torrey v. Hamilton

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1994No. S-5210PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHEWS, Justice.

Dennis W. Torrey, the debtor under a state court judgment in favor of Robert E. Hamilton, filed for bankruptcy. Hamilton, in turn, filed an adversary proceeding in Tor-rey’s bankruptcy case. The question presented in this appeal is whether the attorney’s fees incurred in the adversary proceeding in bankruptcy are recoverable as “costs of collection” for the original state court judgment. We answer this question in the negative.

The $10,500 superior court judgment against Torrey was entered in 1988. After Torrey filed for bankruptcy and Hamilton filed an adversary action in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Alaska State Housing Authoarity v. Riley Pleas, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. Alaska Land Title Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rockstad v. EriksonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Exxon Corp. v. BurglinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. O'CALLAGHAN v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Marsingill v. O'MALLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Hatch v. T & L ASSOCIATESNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API