Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Fujitsu Technology & Business of America, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 11, 2017No. Case No. 16-cv-03698 NCPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*463ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 71, 72

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge

In this ERISA retirement plan case, former Fujitsu employees accuse Fujitsu and a plan administrator, Shepherd Kap-lan, of breaching their fiduciary duties by making imprudent investments. Defendants each move to dismiss the claims in the case, arguing that they acted prudently given their knowledge at the time, and that plaintiffs can only seek recovery for three years worth of claims.

The Court finds that defendants’ arguments challenge the facts of plaintiffs’ complaint, thus they are…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy CommitteeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  2. Bouvy v. Analog Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
  3. Cevasco v. Allegiant Travel CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  4. Christopher Dawson-Roberts v. Norman S. Wright Mechanical Equipment LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  5. Covington v. Biogen Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API