Johnson v. Fujitsu Technology & Business of America, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
*463ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 71, 72
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge
In this ERISA retirement plan case, former Fujitsu employees accuse Fujitsu and a plan administrator, Shepherd Kap-lan, of breaching their fiduciary duties by making imprudent investments. Defendants each move to dismiss the claims in the case, arguing that they acted prudently given their knowledge at the time, and that plaintiffs can only seek recovery for three years worth of claims.
The Court finds that defendants’ arguments challenge the facts of plaintiffs’ complaint, thus they are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy CommitteeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Bouvy v. Analog Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Cevasco v. Allegiant Travel CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- Christopher Dawson-Roberts v. Norman S. Wright Mechanical Equipment LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Covington v. Biogen Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.