Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bellmon v. Albert

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 1982No. 57824Published

1Concurrence

DOOLIN, Justice,

specially concurring:

I concur with the majority, but believe my learned colleagues do not go far enough in the analysis of the issues in this case. If this State is to qualify representatives for the National House of Representatives which will convene and organize on January 3,1983, we must embark upon the consideration of prospective facts and conditions. It behooves us to inquire and look into the “seeds of time,” and speak. The specter of challenge, contest and litigation should be laid to rest in so far as it is possible to do so.

The element of time1 presented in this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Maryland Citizens for a Representative General Assembly v. Governor of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API