Legal Opinion

Lowell v. Merchants' Nat. Bank

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided August 11, 1922No. 111PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity, brought to recover an alleged preference.

The plaintiffs are trustees by appointment of the United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, dated December 8, 1920, of the estate of one Charles Ponzi, of Lexington, county of Suffolk, commonwealth of Massachusetts, a bankrupt.

The defendant is a national bank incorporated under the laws of the United States of America, located in Manchester, in the state of New Hampshire.

The plaintiffs base their right of recovery upon three grounds, as follows:(1) That the defendant is liable as having…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. New York County National Bank v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Dean v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. National Bank of Newport v. National Herkimer County Bank of Little FallsSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Armstrong v. American Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Feldman v. Capitol Piece Dye Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  2. Hall v. Rochester Trust Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1935
  3. Cunningham v. Merchants' Nat. Bank of ManchesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
  4. Cunningham v. Merchants' Nat. Bank of ManchesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
  5. In re RiveraDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API