Legal Opinion
Zamora v. Swift Transportation Corp.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided April 10, 2008No. 3:07-cv-00452PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, District Judge.
On this day, the Court considered Defendant Swift Transportation Corpora tion’s (“Swift”) “Motion to Stay Court Proceeding Pending Arbitration and Motion to Compel Arbitration,” filed on February 29, 2008, and Plaintiff Cynthia Zamora’s (“Zamora”) “Response to Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration,” filed on March 10, 2008; and (3) Swift’s “Reply to Plaintiffs Response to Stay Proceedings and Motion to Compel Arbitration,” filed on April 7, 2008, in the above-captioned cause. After due consideration,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Washington Mutual Finance Group, LLC v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- In Re C H News Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Frye v. Speedway Chevrolet CadillacMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- In re State Farm LloydsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- In re: Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. Patrick Hagaman DaughertyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2026
- Velazquez v. Village Farms, L.P.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2020