Palomo v. State

BURKE, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Appellant, Aventura H. Palomo, Jr., challenges the district court's decision denying motions to continue his trial. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the motions. Appellant *702also claims that his written sentence is illegal. While we conclude that the sentence is not illegal, the written sentence is inconsistent with the oral sentence, and we remand for correction of the sentence.

ISSUES

[¶2] Appellant presents two issues:

1. Did the district court abuse its discretion when it denied Appellant's motions to continue the trial…