Legal Opinion

Boggs v. Bard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1828PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Writ of error to the Court of Common Picas of Indiana county.

1Opinion of the Court

*103The opinion of the court was delivered by

Huston, J.

— This was an action of assumpsit .by the plaintiff* and his demand consisted of an account settled with John Boggs, in his life time, by J. Johnson, and a claim by the plaintiff as administrator of J. Boggs against James Johnson in his life time. The demands are both of ancient date.

The settled account was admitted in evidence. The evidence of the assumpsit to the administrator was rejected, and to that exception was taken. ■ . - '

The reasons which governed the Court of Common Pleas we have not, but their decision has been attempted to be…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jeronique Cunningham v. Stuart HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Herman v. RinkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. Peries v. AycinenaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  4. Hopkins v. Southern American Soda Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API