Legal Opinion

Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Paulson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Traill County; Pollock, J. Action b)r Nichols & Shepard Company against John E. Paul-son and A. E. Paulson. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The defendants have appealed from a judgment rendered by the district court of Traill county, canceling a judgment in claim and delivery formerly rendered in the action, which judgment so cancelled was in defendant’s favor, and awarded to them the return of a certain threshing engine involved .in the action, or its value, together with damages for the taking and detention, and for costs. To avoid confusion, it is proper to state that the judgment vacated and judgment here appealed from were both rendered in the same action, namely, in the claim and delivery action above entitled. While it is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nichols Shepard Co. v. John E. Paulson & Bro.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Paulson v. Nichols & Shepard Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John Deere Company v. Nygard Equipment, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Caldwell v. StilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Union Storage & Transfer Co. v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Vallancy v. HuntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  5. John Deere Company v. Nygard Equipment, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API