Overman Cushion Tire Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The appellant has been held an infringer of patent No. 1,092,078 for an automobile tiro [40 F.(2d) 460 (C. C. A. 2)], and the issue of damages resulting therefrom was referred to a master. The master’s report was approved by the court below, which stated that the infringement had been “conscious and deliberate,” and that the appellee “had been subjected to protracted, vexatious, and expensive litigation” and had suffered damages by “deprivation of what, save for the infringements, would have been earned by the plaintiff.” Exercising its discretion under the statute, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Metallic Rubber Tire Co. v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Fox v. Knickerbocker Engraving Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
- Wallace & Tiernan Co. v. City of SyracuseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- New England Fibre Blanket Co. v. Portland TelegramCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Overman Cushion Tire Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
3Cited by17 opinions
- Robert Bosch, Llc v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Patterson-Ballagh Corp. v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Overman Cushion Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Union Carbide Corp. v. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Activated Sludge v. Sanitary Dist. of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.