Legal Opinion

Hickman v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided August 29, 2007No. CA CR 06-841PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.

Roderick L. Hickman appeals from his conviction for residential burglary. He raises three arguments for reversal: 1) the trial court erred in not issuing his requested jury instruction on disputed-accomplice liability regarding one of the State’s witnesses; 2) the State failed to prove that he was an accomplice to burglary; 3) the trial court erred in denying his request for a continuance. Because we agree with appellant’s first argument, we hold that the trial court erred in not issuing the disputed-accomplice liability instruction. Accordingly, we reverse…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grillot v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Passley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hickman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Hickman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API