Legal Opinion
Paucatuck Eastern Pequot Indians v. Connecticut Indian Affairs Council
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 28, 1989No. 6292PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiffs appeal to this court from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the decision of the named defendant, the Connecticut Indian Affairs Council (CIAC). The trial court dismissed the plaintiffs’ administrative appeal on the ground that they were not aggrieved and therefore lacked standing to pursue that appeal. We find error and hold that the plaintiffs have standing to appeal.
*6Certain facts are relevant to the disposition of this appeal. The plaintiffs include (1) the Paucatuck Pequot Indians of Connecticut,1 (2) Helen LeGault, Ruth Geer and Raymond Geer,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Connecticut Business & Industry Ass'n v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. SebastianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Conn. Coal. for Justice in Educ. Funding, Inc. v. RellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Fort Trumbull Cons. v. Planning Zoning Comm., No. 557775 (Aug. 28, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Mills v. Pettit, No. 57933 (Jun. 10, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.