Legal Opinion
(PC) Heim v. Doe
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 30, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00391Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER HEIM, 1:20-cv-00391-AWI-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A 13 vs. CLAIM, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 1.) 14 JANE DOE, et al., THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE 15 Defendants. THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 17 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Christopher Heim (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 20 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint 21 commencing this action on March 11, 2020.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.