Legal Opinion

Danskin, Inc. v. Dan River, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 3, 1974No. Patent Appeal No. 9206PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (abstracted at 176 USPQ 224 (1972)), adhered to on reconsideration, granting applicant-appellee’s motion for summary judgment, thereby dismissing the opposition of appellant to the registration by appellee of DANSHEER1 as a trademark for “men’s, women’s and children’s hose and hosiery and pantyhose.” Op-poser-appellant relied upon registrations of its trademark DANSKIN2 for knitted articles of clothing, particularly leotards, tights, hosiery, pantyhose, and similar products.

*1387Appellee moved for summary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  3. Old Grantian Company, Limited v. William Grant & Sons LimitedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. Blanchard Importing & Distributing Co., Inc. v. Societe E. Blanchard Et FilsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Australian Therapeutic v. Naked Tm, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  2. Selva & Sons, Inc. v. Nina Footwear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Denton v. Mr. Swiss of Missouri, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. Chromalloy American Corporation v. Kenneth Gordon (New Orleans), Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. E.G.L. Gem Lab Ltd. v. Gem Quality Institute, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API