Old Grantian Company, Limited v. William Grant & Sons Limited
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
We are here dealing with a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board granting opposer’s motion for summary judgment. The substance of that motion as summarized by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board is “that applicant having admitted that it was privy to the previous proceeding from which no appeal was taken is estopped from relitigating the issue of likelihood of confusion since the mark under attack herein is, in legal contemplation, substantially the same as that previously opposed.”
This appeal comes to us based on the following facts of record. Appellant sought…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Old Charter Distillery Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1959
- In re Retail Clerks International Protective Ass'nCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
3Cited by8 opinions
- Haymaker Sports, Inc. v. TurianCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Wells Cargo, Inc. v. Wells Cargo, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Danskin, Inc. v. Dan River, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Conde Nast Publications, Inc. v. Miss Quality, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Blanchard Importing & Distributing Co., Inc. v. Societe E. Blanchard Et FilsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.