Legal Opinion

Gansevoort 69 Realty LLC v. Laba

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 2015No. 15196 651010/13PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered February 27, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff Gansevoort 69 Realty LLC’s motion for summary judgment, and denied defendant Laba’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

“On a motion for summary judgment to enforce a written guaranty, all that the creditor need prove is an absolute and unconditional guaranty, the underlying debt, and the guarantor’s failure to perform under the guaranty” (City of New York v Clarose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rose v. Spa Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. City of New York v. Clarose Cinema Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Paramount Leasehold, L.P. v. 43rd Street Deli, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. P62 LLC v. WFP Retail Co. L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. P62 LLC v. WFP Retail Co. L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. ULM I Holding Corp. v. Corbin-HillmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. ULM I Holding Corp. v. Corbin-HillmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API