Gusdorf & Co. v. Ikelheimer & Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from City Court of Selma. Heard before Hon. JoN. Haralson. Tliis was a bill in equity, exhibited by E. Ikelheimer & Co. against M. Gusdorf & Co., S. Lehman, Heilman & Herman and Keifer Bros.; and was filed on 15th June, 1882. The purpose of the bill, and most of the material facts disclosed by the record are stated in the opinion, rendering necessary only a brief supplemental statement in this report.
Read the full summary
Appeal from City Court of Selma. Heard before Hon. JoN. Haralson. Tliis was a bill in equity, exhibited by E. Ikelheimer & Co. against M. Gusdorf & Co., S. Lehman, Heilman & Herman and Keifer Bros.; and was filed on 15th June, 1882. The purpose of the bill, and most of the material facts disclosed by the record are stated in the opinion, rendering necessary only a brief supplemental statement in this report. Heilman & Herman and Keifer Bros, sued out attachments against the defendant Lehman, which were levied on the personal property on which the execution in favor of Gusdorf & Co. was…
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKELL, 0. J.
The appellants, Gusdorf & Co., were judgment creditors of Solomon Lehman, and caused an execution issuing upon their judgment to be levied upon personal property of value sufficient to satisfy it. At the time of the judgment and levy, they had also dioses in action transferred to them by the judgment debtor, as collateral security for their debt. The appellees were general creditors of Lehman, and, on the day succeeding the levy of the execution, they caused an attachment to issue, which was levied upon the same personal property on which the execution was levied. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nelson & Hatch v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
- Ray's Adm'r v. WombleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Williams v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Chapman v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Houston v. StantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cartwright v. Bamberger, Bloom & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Central Lumber Co. v. JacksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Henderson v. Steiner-Lobman Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Bamberger, Bloom & Co. v. Voorhees, Miller & RupelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Garrison v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.