Robinson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction for child molestation, Michael Robinson argues that trial and first appellate counsel were ineffective. We affirm because these contentions have no merit.
“On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, with the defendant no longer enjoying a presumption of innocence.” Reese v. State, 270 Ga. App. 522, 523 (607 SE2d 165) (2004). We neither weigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses, but determine only whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Timberlake v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Suggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Reese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Whorton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Logan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Jeremy Ryan Hilley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.