Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 17, 2011No. A10A2204PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

Earnest Lee Smith appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for new trial after a jury convicted him on one count of aggravated assault. Smith does not contest that the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction. Rather, he asserts that he is entitled to a new trial on the following grounds: (1) prosecutorial misconduct; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) ineffective assistance of counsel; and (4) the trial court’s failure to hold a pre-sentencing hearing. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence at…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Timberlake v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Benham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  5. Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Tyner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Goodson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  4. Swanson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  5. Swanson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API