Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Fraser

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for nonsuit reserved until after verdict of the jury.

1Opinion of the CourtCochrane, J.

This action is to recover on a promissory note which was given to renew a prior promissory note originally given for money loaned. The defense is usury. The complaint, in addition to the usual allegations pertinent to such an action, contains additional and unnecessary allegations, which epitomized briefly are in effect that at the time of the delivery of the original note the defendants received the plaintiffs’ checks aggregating the amount of such note, and also promised to issue to each of the plaintiffs five shares of the capital stock of the American Ball Trap Company of one hundred…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cutler v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Marvin v. FesterNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  3. Morrison v. VerdenalNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leibovici v. RawickiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
  2. Domestic Finance Corp. v. Williams, New York County Courts1940
  3. Silverman v. KatzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API