Wingo v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Judge.
This is a conviction for incest. The indictment was filed on May 14, 1918, and charged that the offense was committed on or about June 1, 1915. The court in instructing the jury authorized a conviction if the act of intercourse took place “on or about the day alleged in the indictment.” A timely objection to this phrase of the charge was made, with the suggestion that it be so amended as.to tell the jury that to authorize the conviction they must believe that the act of intercourse took place within three years anterior to the time the indictment was filed, and he complains of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Gillespie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Burford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Burford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Wingo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Laredo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Tindall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.