Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1906No. 3631PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HEUDERSOM, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of incest, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary; and appeals.

By appellant’s first bill of exceptions he questions the action of the court in charging the jury on accomplice’s testimony. Said charge is as follows: “If the jury shall find from the evidence that the witness Lizzie Gillespie, with whom the incestuous intercourse is alleged to have been had, did voluntarily, and with the same intent that actuated defendant, unite with him in the alleged commission of the offense set out in the indictment, then and in that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Poyner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  2. Burnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Coburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Bohannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API