Legal Opinion

In re the Proceeding by the City of Syracuse to Acquire Title to Lands of Eastman

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ross,

Official Referee. The city of Syracuse has constructed a reservoir near the west line of said city (I believe now is in the city) for storage and distribution of water for the use of the inhabitants of said city, and seeks by methods provided by law to acquire certain premises owned by Eastman for the purpose of laying upon said premises a supply pipe from the aforesaid reservoir connecting the same with the waterworks system now existing.

The owner, Mr. Eastman, answers, stating ■ thirteen different reasons why the city should not have the right to condemn his property as sought herein.

Th…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re N.Y. and H.R.R. Co. v. . KipNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Matter of MarshNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. In re Bronx Parkway CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York Telephone Co. v. WoodNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Dormitory Authority v. 59th St. & 10th Ave. Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API