Legal Opinion

State v. Tanner

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 16, 1993No. 90C-21505, 90C-21506, 90C-21507. CA A74936 (Control), CA A74937, CA A74938PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of three counts of burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. He appeals from the consecutive sentences imposed and the sentencing court’s determination of the length of his sentences using a criminal history score of “E” and not “I,” in violation of OAR 253-12-020(2)(a)(b). We conclude that we lack authority to review the claim of error and affirm.

Through negotiations with the state, defendant agreed to a stipulated facts trial on the three counts of burglary in the first degree, and the state agreed not to indict defendant on other uncharged burglaries. As part of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. KilbornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. KephartOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. RusenOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. UptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. State v. DavillaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. CavotaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API