Legal Opinion

Brosnahan v. Caliber Home Loans Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided January 7, 2021No. 3:20-cv-08272Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Michael Brosnahan and Mary Brosnahan, No. 3:20-cv-08272-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Caliber Home Loans et al., 13 Defendants. 14 Pending before this Court is Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion to Remand After 15 Removal (“Motion to Remand”). (Doc. 11.) Defendants responded, (Doc. 14), and 16 Plaintiffs replied. (Doc. 16.) The Court is also in receipt of Defendants’ Motion to Accept 17 Filing of Notice of Removal. (Doc. 7.) The Court has determined to rule without oral 18 argument, finding that it is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Joe B. RITCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN DRUG COMPANY; William Dement, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API