Legal Opinion

Mahoney-Jones Co. v. Osborne

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarser, J.

There was much evidence tending to show tbe contentions of tbe respective parties. Tbe plaintiffs introduced direct testimony tending to show that tbe defendant bad admitted that be was a member of'the firm of James Osborne & Co., with bis son, James Osborne. Tbe evidence for plaintiffs further shows that notice that James Osborne bad reported to mercantile agencies that Eielden Osborne was a member of tbis firm bad been brought to tbe knowledge of Eielden Osborne, and that be failed to make timely denial.

Tbe defendant contended that be bad answered all letters and requests that bad come to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Avery v. Stewart.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Smith v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Ivey v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Holloman v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. State v. . WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Winkler v. Appalachian Amusement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. . ShipmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Liberty Chair Co. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Higgs-Taft Furniture Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API