Legal Opinion
City of Portsmouth v. Richard Schlesinger and William Weinstein
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 13, 1995No. 94-1274PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, District Judge.
This contract action came before the district court in exercise of its diversity jurisdiction. The law of New Hampshire controls. The record amply supports the careful findings of the district judge and thus the facts may be simply stated. It is the law of New Hampshire that is complex.
The appellees Richard Schlesinger and William Weinstein (the “Developers”) are real estate developers who were the sole general partners in Portsmouth Coastal Development Partners (“Portsmouth Coastal”). 1 In 1985, Portsmouth Coastal acquired from the plaintiff, the City of Portsmouth (the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- In Re Extradition of Curtis Andrew Howard. United States of America v. Curtis Andrew HowardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- American Title Insurance v. East West FinancialCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Black Bear Lodge v. Trillium Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Portsmouth v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996