Legal Opinion

Shaddy v. Gunter

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided August 8, 1988No. CV87-L-323PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

URBOM, District Judge.

Philip Shaddy, an inmate at the Nebraska State Penitentiary (“NSP”), has filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging an operational memorandum (“OM”) that outlines the institution’s visitation policy as unconstitutionally vague. Operational memoranda are rules tailored to the unique needs of individual facilities within the Department of Correctional Services and derived from administrative regulations promulgated by the director of that department (“DCS”). In pertinent part, the NSP’s visitation OM states that “[a]n embrace and a kiss at…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jerry Young A/K/A Ramadan v. Donald Selsky, P. Orengo, R. Althouse, R.J. Cunningham, D. Schaller, L. JewettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Hyatt v. Town of Lake LureDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
  3. El Tabech v. GunterDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1996
  4. Jerry Young A/K/A Ramadan v. Donald Selsky, P. Orengo, R. Althouse, R.J. Cunningham, D. Schaller, L. JewettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API