Legal Opinion

Smith v. Tyler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

Action by the appellee against the appellants, to enjoin the collection of a judgment. The complaint was in three paragraphs. To the first a demurrer was sustained. The jury found for the defendants on the second. The sufficiency of the third is called in question by the appellants, who assign for error the overruling of a demurrer thereto. That paragraph is as follows: "

“’The plaintiff complains further of the defendants and says, that oxx the 30th day of June, 1866, said defendaxxt William C. Smith recovered judgment in the Warren Comixxoxx Pleas Court against Abram S. Jones, Isaac S.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ritenour v. MathewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Stone v. LewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Fitzgerald v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Markel's Administrator v. Spitler's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Bateman v. DanielsIndiana Supreme Court · 1839

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hancock v. YadenIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Jones v. SwiftIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Richardson Drug Co. v. DunaganColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Sargent v. RobertsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Fletcher v. WurglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API