Legal Opinion

Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 19, 2016No. 14-5302PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PILLARD, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals its liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) for a portion of the cost of cleaning up hazardous substances at three California facilities owned by Lockheed Martin (Lockheed or the Company). The government’s involvement at the facilities dates to the Cold War, when the Department of Defense contracted with Lockheed to build state-of-the-art, solid-propellant rockets. Lockheed’s production of those rockets severely contaminated the sites, with the contamination migrating into groundwater…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. B.F. Goodrich Co. v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Trinity Industries Inc v. Greenlease Holding CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. Eco Tour Adventures, Inc. v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc. and The Williams Companies, Inc. v. State of Alaska, Flint Hills Resources Alaska, LLC, and Flint Hills Resources, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Gov't of Guam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Roosevelt Irrigation District v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API