Legal Opinion

Lane v. Honeywell, Inc.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided May 26, 1987No. Civ. C86-445GPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

J. THOMAS GREENE, District Judge.

This matter came before the court on March 23, 1987, pursuant to the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Frank Lane (“Lane”) was represented by Jackson Howard, and Honeywell, Inc. (“Honeywell”) was represented by Joy L. Sanders. Both parties submitted memorandums and presented extensive oral argument. On April 6, 1987, evidence was heard with respect to the existence and scope of certain insurance coverage for Honeywell, after which the court took the matter under advisement. The court being now fully advised sets forth its…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Huron Holding Corp. v. Lincoln Mine Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Penrod v. Nu Creation Creme, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Noble v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Li v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Chambers v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API