Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 15, 1994No. 920820-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREGORY K. ORME, Associate Presiding Judge:

Agency Rent-A-Car appeals the trial court’s summary judgment ruling that Agency, who is self-insured, was primarily responsible for claims arising from an accident involving a vehicle owned by Agency and driven by Jorgina Chambers. Agency also appeals the amount of its liability as determined by the court. We affirm the court’s ruling imposing primary responsibility on Agency, but reduce the amount of its liability-

FACTS

The facts are not in dispute. Agency Rent-A-Car, as its name suggests, is in the business of renting automobiles. On December…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hearty v. HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. ZellarsTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Marriott Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Home Indemnity Company v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Russell v. PaulsonUtah Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hertz Corp. v. Robineau, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  2. Johnson v. HigleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  3. Li v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Progressive Northern Insurance v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of Boston, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. Hertz Corporation v. Patricia Robineau and Texas All Risk General Agency, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API