Legal Opinion
Smith v. Ciesielski
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided September 30, 2013No. 1:11-cv-00234-SEB-MJDPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 70], filed on April 13, 2012 pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56. Defendants seek summary judgment on all of Plaintiffs claims under the United States Constitution, the Indiana Constitution, and Indiana tort law. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
Factual Background
Plaintiff Andrea Smith is a resident of Indianapolis who has brought this suit seeking damages for…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- COX v. RANDY WEITZELDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
- City of Indianapolis v. The Estate of Charles Michael AlexanderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2026
- Densmore v. City of KnoxDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Doe v. BarberDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025
- LAUDERDALE v. RUSSELLDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.