Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 9, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Mark T. Smith appeals a judgment convicting him of operating under the influence (Class D) in violation of 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411(1), (5) (1996),1 entered by the District Court (Houlton, O’Mara, J.) following his stipulated plea, subject to appeal. He asserts that the officer who stopped him had an insufficient basis to form a reasonable, articulable suspicion of violation of law to justify the stop. Because Smith did not comply with the requirements of M.R.Crim. P. 11(a)(2) to enter a conditional plea of guilty, his issues on appeal are not sufficiently preserved. Accordingly, we affirm…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DulacSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  2. State v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. State v. Reynoso-HernandezSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  4. State v. EklundSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. State v. FowlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Maine v. John D. SchlosserSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API