Legal Opinion
State v. Cyr
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 23, 1985PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Justice.
Defendant Albert J. Cyr appeals from his conviction in the Superior Court (Cumberland County) as an habitual motor vehicle offender. 29 M.R.S.A. § 2298 (Supp.1985-1986). He argues on appeal that the Superior Court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as the result of a police stop of his motor vehicle. We deny the appeal.
Preliminarily, we address the newly-adopted procedure by which this case is presented on appeal. Defendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle while an habitual offender. After unsuccessfully moving to suppress any evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. GriffinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- State v. PlaczekSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- United States v. Ronald Dwight PoseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- State v. GarlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. SchlosserUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- State v. DulacSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- State v. BentoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- State v. RichfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.