Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1989No. B029874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

Here we hold * that the definition of a security in California does not depend upon whether or not it is exempt from qualification under the California Corporate Securities Act.

Jerry Donald Smith was convicted of two counts of violating Penal Code section 487, subdivision 1 (grand theft) and two counts of violating Corporations Code section 25401 (securities fraud). We affirm.

On the People’s cross-appeal, we aifirm dismissal of two counts alleging securities fraud. Smith may not be held criminally liable for failing to inform potential investors about a prior misdemeanor…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People v. FigueroaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. United States v. William J. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Silver Hills Country Club v. SobieskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. People v. SydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. FrederickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Reiswig v. Department of CorporationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. People v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API