Legal Opinion

People v. Black

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 2017No. H043360PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

—Defendant Charles Baxter Black was charged with five counts of using false statements in the offer or sale of a security (Corp. Code, §§ 25401, 25540, subd. (b)) after he persuaded an acquaintance, Bronic Knarr, to invest in a real estate development opportunity in Idaho in return for a promissory note, the terms of which were amended and extended several times but never realized. The trial court set aside two of the counts pursuant to Penal Code section 995 based on a determination that the promissory note was not a security. The People appeal the order granting the motion…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Marine Bank v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fuller v. BaeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2022
  2. People v. BallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  3. People v. McGraw CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. Meserve CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Scripps Health v. nThrive Revenue Systems, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API