Legal Opinion
Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 26, 2010No. Civ. 09-72-SLR, 09-232-SLRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
Presently before the court are ten motions brought in two related patent infringement actions involving SSBG and Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) relating to Teles’s U.S. Patent Nos. 6,954,453 (“the '453 patent”), 7,145,902 (“the '902 patent”) and 7,483,431 (“the '431 patent”) (collectively, the “patents in suit”). The procedural history of these actions is complex and detailed below. Pending before the court are: (1) Teles’s motion to amend its pleadings (Civ. No. 09-72, D.I. 86; Civ. No. 09-232, D.I. 170); (2) Cisco’s motion to…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dataquill Ltd. v. High Tech Computer Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2011
- Hedgepath v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020