John J. Ward v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The Justice Department in recent years has devoted substantial resources to prosecuting corrupt public officials. An important weapon in this campaign has been the “intangible rights” doctrine of federal mail and wire fraud (18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343), a doctrine whereby public officials who accept bribes are deemed by doing so to have defrauded the public of its right to the honest provision of public services. Last year, in a stunning setback for the Department, the Supreme Court rejected the intangible-rights doctrine. McNally v. United States, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 2875,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Schilb v. KuebelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Thomas E. KeaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Dynalectric Company Paxson Electric Company G.W. Walther Ewalt Wesley C. Paxson, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. AshmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Buford v. H & R Block, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996
- United States v. Robert L. Bailey, Kevin Kehoe, Robert M. Lang, and Harold J. TicktinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.