Legal Opinion

Thomas v. O'Malley

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 19, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-0530Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AKEEM T.,1 Plaintiff, v. No. 24-cv-530-MAU FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security2 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Akeem T. seeks Disability Insurance (“DI”) and Supplemental Security Insurance (“SSI”) benefits under the Social Security Act (“the Act”). He claims to have depression, anxiety, a learning disability, post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”), and insomnia. ECF Nos. 7 (“AR”) at 82, 287; 12 at 1. The Social Security Administration (“SSA” or “Commissioner”) entered a final decision denying Plaintiff’s claim…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Owen L. GORDON, Appellant, v. Richard S. SCHWEIKER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API